inheritance tax. There has in fact been a net loss to the Swedish taxpayers as a result of this reform.

The case of Italy, however, is the most interesting of all. Italian Inheritance and Gift Tax (Imposta sulle Donazioni e Successioni) was abolished in October 2001. As a result, there is now no inheritance tax whatsoever in Italy. Unlike the situation in Sweden, however, taxation was not increased in other areas to cancel out the inheritance tax saving: it is a genuine saving that applies to anyone domiciled in Italy, i.e. anyone not taxed by a foreign government.

The Italian government introduced this measure for two reasons. Firstly, it realized that the value of the tax gathered was little more than the cost of the bureaucracy required to administer it. Secondly, Italy has traditionally been a big exporter

They say that two things are inevitable in life: death and taxes. We don't much care for thinking about either. Inheritance tax is the one tax we don't pay until we are dead, so perhaps understandably it's a subject way down our list of priorities. When pressed, most people express the hope that their families, rather than the state, will inherit their wealth when they die. Western governments vary considerably in the extent to which they accommodate this basic human desire. To a greater or lesser degree, death taxes are nearly everywhere viewed as a legitimate tool for promoting the objective of social equality. Karl Marx, Andrew Carnegie and John Maynard Keynes had this in common: they all favored high inheritance taxes. However, this view is by no means universal: with a little planning and a global perspective, there are steps that can be taken to avoid the tax altogether. Indeed, there is some truth in the old assertion that inheritance taxes are paid only by the poorly advised.

Most countries, with the exception of the UK and USA, tax the beneficiaries of a will, rather than the estate itself. International comparisons are difficult, but the following details are illuminating:

• In the USA, a surviving spouse pays nothing. All other bequests above $1.5 US are subject to federal taxation at 45%, with additional local taxes pushing that figure above 50% in many states. When the current republican administration came into office in January 2001, the lower threshold was only $675,000: it has more than doubled in just 5 years. The USA now has the second-lowest inheritance taxes in the world.

• In the UK, a surviving spouse again pays nothing. All other bequests above ?275,000 (?396,000 Euro or $483,000 US) are subject to taxation at 40%.

• In Germany, inheritance tax is paid by the beneficiary: spouses pay 7% on legacies above ?307,000 Euro ($374,000 US), rising to 30% on legacies above ?25.9 Million Euro ($31.5 Million US) on a sliding scale. Non-spouse relatives pay 12% to 40%, and non-relatives pay 17% to 50% on legacies above ?307,000 Euro ($374,000 US), both rising on a similar sliding scale.

• In France, as in Germany, inheritance tax is paid by the beneficiary. A surviving spouse pays 5% on legacies above ?76,000 Euro ($92,000 US), rising on a sliding scale to 40% on legacies above ?1.776 Million Euro ($2.162 Million US). Other relatives pay at similar rates but with a lower tax-free allowance, while non-relatives pay at up to 60% with an almost zero tax-free allowance.

• In Spain, spouses have to pay 8.5% on legacies above ?16,000 Euro ($19,000 US), rising to 34% on legacies above ?800,00 Euro ($974,000 US). There is a partial-exemption system, but to benefit from it the beneficiary must keep any real estate asset at least 10 years. When the surviving spouse dies, inheritance tax has to be paid again - but this time on 100% rather than 50% of the assets. The Spanish tax system appears specifically designed to hit disproportionately all non-Spanish or second-home-owning beneficiaries.

Sweden is an interesting case. Although inheritance tax has been abolished there, it now charges its residents a wealth tax of 1.5% of their assets above ?200,000 ($350,000 US) each year. This new wealth tax raises far more revenue than the old, abolished inheritance tax. There has in fact been a net loss to the Swedish taxpayers as a result of this reform.

The case of Italy, however, is the most interesting of all. Italian Inheritance and Gift Tax (Imposta sulle Donazioni e Successioni) was abolished in October 2001. As a result, there is now no inheritance tax whatsoever in Italy. Unlike the situation in Sweden, however, taxation was not increased in other areas to cancel out the inheritance tax saving: it is a genuine saving that applies to anyone domiciled in Italy, i.e. anyone not taxed by a foreign government.

The Italian government introduced this measure for two reasons. Firstly, it realized that the value of the tax gathered was little more than the cost of the bureaucracy required to administer it. Secondly, Italy has traditionally been a big exporter o

s that can be taken to avoid the tax altogether. Indeed, there is some truth in the old assertion that inheritance taxes are paid only by the poorly advised.

Most countries, with the exception of the UK and USA, tax the beneficiaries of a will, rather than the estate itself. International comparisons are difficult, but the following details are illuminating:

• In the USA, a surviving spouse pays nothing. All other bequests above $1.5 US are subject to federal taxation at 45%, with additional local taxes pushing that figure above 50% in many states. When the current republican administration came into office in January 2001, the lower threshold was only $675,000: it has more than doubled in just 5 years. The USA now has the second-lowest inheritance taxes in the world.

• In the UK, a surviving spouse again pays nothing. All other bequests above ?275,000 (?396,000 Euro or $483,000 US) are subject to taxation at 40%.

• In Germany, inheritance tax is paid by the beneficiary: spouses pay 7% on legacies above ?307,000 Euro ($374,000 US), rising to 30% on legacies above ?25.9 Million Euro ($31.5 Million US) on a sliding scale. Non-spouse relatives pay 12% to 40%, and non-relatives pay 17% to 50% on legacies above ?307,000 Euro ($374,000 US), both rising on a similar sliding scale.

• In France, as in Germany, inheritance tax is paid by the beneficiary. A surviving spouse pays 5% on legacies above ?76,000 Euro ($92,000 US), rising on a sliding scale to 40% on legacies above ?1.776 Million Euro ($2.162 Million US). Other relatives pay at similar rates but with a lower tax-free allowance, while non-relatives pay at up to 60% with an almost zero tax-free allowance.

• In Spain, spouses have to pay 8.5% on legacies above ?16,000 Euro ($19,000 US), rising to 34% on legacies above ?800,00 Euro ($974,000 US). There is a partial-exemption system, but to benefit from it the beneficiary must keep any real estate asset at least 10 years. When the surviving spouse dies, inheritance tax has to be paid again - but this time on 100% rather than 50% of the assets. The Spanish tax system appears specifically designed to hit disproportionately all non-Spanish or second-home-owning beneficiaries.

Sweden is an interesting case. Although inheritance tax has been abolished there, it now charges its residents a wealth tax of 1.5% of their assets above ?200,000 ($350,000 US) each year. This new wealth tax raises far more revenue than the old, abolished inheritance tax. There has in fact been a net loss to the Swedish taxpayers as a result of this reform.

The case of Italy, however, is the most interesting of all. Italian Inheritance and Gift Tax (Imposta sulle Donazioni e Successioni) was abolished in October 2001. As a result, there is now no inheritance tax whatsoever in Italy. Unlike the situation in Sweden, however, taxation was not increased in other areas to cancel out the inheritance tax saving: it is a genuine saving that applies to anyone domiciled in Italy, i.e. anyone not taxed by a foreign government.

The Italian government introduced this measure for two reasons. Firstly, it realized that the value of the tax gathered was little more than the cost of the bureaucracy required to administer it. Secondly, Italy has traditionally been a big exporter

ys nothing. All other bequests above ?275,000 (?396,000 Euro or $483,000 US) are subject to taxation at 40%.

In Germany, inheritance tax is paid by the beneficiary: spouses pay 7% on legacies above ?307,000 Euro ($374,000 US), rising to 30% on legacies above ?25.9 Million Euro ($31.5 Million US) on a sliding scale. Non-spouse relatives pay 12% to 40%, and non-relatives pay 17% to 50% on legacies above ?307,000 Euro ($374,000 US), both rising on a similar sliding scale.

In France, as in Germany, inheritance tax is paid by the beneficiary. A surviving spouse pays 5% on legacies above ?76,000 Euro ($92,000 US), rising on a sliding scale to 40% on legacies above ?1.776 Million Euro ($2.162 Million US). Other relatives pay at similar rates but with a lower tax-free allowance, while non-relatives pay at up to 60% with an almost zero tax-free allowance.

In Spain, spouses have to pay 8.5% on legacies above ?16,000 Euro ($19,000 US), rising to 34% on legacies above ?800,00 Euro ($974,000 US). There is a partial-exemption system, but to benefit from it the beneficiary must keep any real estate asset at least 10 years. When the surviving spouse dies, inheritance tax has to be paid again - but this time on 100% rather than 50% of the assets. The Spanish tax system appears specifically designed to hit disproportionately all non-Spanish or second-home-owning beneficiaries. Sweden is an interesting case. Although inheritance tax has been abolished there, it now charges its residents a wealth tax of 1.5% of their assets above ?200,000 ($350,000 US) each year. This new wealth tax raises far more revenue than the old, abolished inheritance tax. There has in fact been a net loss to the Swedish taxpayers as a result of this reform.

The case of Italy, however, is the most interesting of all. Italian Inheritance and Gift Tax (Imposta sulle Donazioni e Successioni) was abolished in October 2001. As a result, there is now no inheritance tax whatsoever in Italy. Unlike the situation in Sweden, however, taxation was not increased in other areas to cancel out the inheritance tax saving: it is a genuine saving that applies to anyone domiciled in Italy, i.e. anyone not taxed by a foreign government.

The Italian government introduced this measure for two reasons. Firstly, it realized that the value of the tax gathered was little more than the cost of the bureaucracy required to administer it. Secondly, Italy has traditionally been a big exporter

Commercial Collections Billing Practices Advice
Swiftness is the key to collecting past due commercial accounts because commercial accounts depreciate more faster than consumer accounts.In creating and implementing a billing system, a credit grantor should recognize that time is the safest refuge of any debtor. The more time they are given, the less likely they are to pay. Hence, sales documents should be explicit about payment terms, return privileges, interest charges on overdue accounts, guarantee and service costs.Various Commercial Collection Programs UsedA series of letters used together with an account aging sheet or data printout will help to track sl

th an almost zero tax-free allowance.

In Spain, spouses have to pay 8.5% on legacies above ?16,000 Euro ($19,000 US), rising to 34% on legacies above ?800,00 Euro ($974,000 US). There is a partial-exemption system, but to benefit from it the beneficiary must keep any real estate asset at least 10 years. When the surviving spouse dies, inheritance tax has to be paid again - but this time on 100% rather than 50% of the assets. The Spanish tax system appears specifically designed to hit disproportionately all non-Spanish or second-home-owning beneficiaries. Sweden is an interesting case. Although inheritance tax has been abolished there, it now charges its residents a wealth tax of 1.5% of their assets above ?200,000 ($350,000 US) each year. This new wealth tax raises far more revenue than the old, abolished inheritance tax. There has in fact been a net loss to the Swedish taxpayers as a result of this reform.

The case of Italy, however, is the most interesting of all. Italian Inheritance and Gift Tax (Imposta sulle Donazioni e Successioni) was abolished in October 2001. As a result, there is now no inheritance tax whatsoever in Italy. Unlike the situation in Sweden, however, taxation was not increased in other areas to cancel out the inheritance tax saving: it is a genuine saving that applies to anyone domiciled in Italy, i.e. anyone not taxed by a foreign government.

The Italian government introduced this measure for two reasons. Firstly, it realized that the value of the tax gathered was little more than the cost of the bureaucracy required to administer it. Secondly, Italy has traditionally been a big exporter

Opening a Dollar Store - Effective New Merchandise Stocking Basics
If you are opening a dollar store one of the things to remember is the importance of having newly received merchandise on display and for sale as quickly as possible following receipt of that merchandise. By allowing newly arrived merchandise to sit in the receiving area you are losing money. That lost income could actually be the difference between profit and loss for your business.While it is easy to get sidetracked with other tasks and to delay formal receiving, pricing and stocking of newly-arrived merchandise that is a mistake. As time passes other merchandise will arrive. Soon the merchandise that has been sitting in th

inheritance tax. There has in fact been a net loss to the Swedish taxpayers as a result of this reform.

The case of Italy, however, is the most interesting of all. Italian Inheritance and Gift Tax (Imposta sulle Donazioni e Successioni) was abolished in October 2001. As a result, there is now no inheritance tax whatsoever in Italy. Unlike the situation in Sweden, however, taxation was not increased in other areas to cancel out the inheritance tax saving: it is a genuine saving that applies to anyone domiciled in Italy, i.e. anyone not taxed by a foreign government.

The Italian government introduced this measure for two reasons. Firstly, it realized that the value of the tax gathered was little more than the cost of the bureaucracy required to administer it. Secondly, Italy has traditionally been a big exporter of capital - but the current Italian administration believes that Italy's best interests are served by reversing that flow.

Italy's efforts to attract capital into the country are almost guaranteed to be successful. Taking British buyers of overseas real estate as an example: when buying second homes abroad, 27% of them have in the past chosen Spain, 20% have opted for France, but only 1% have bought in Italy (source: British Office for National Statistics). However, when prospective British buyers were asked in a Barclays Bank survey where they intended to buy in the future, 30% said Spain, 14% said France - and 10% voted for Italy. Clearly, the stimulus provided by these beneficial fiscal changes is set to have a big effect on the Italian property market.

One other thing is also clear, though. Italian real estate might just be the best investment choice you could make for your children.