| Suggest You |
Hubs | Hubbers | Topics | Request |
| #1 in Business | Subscribe Email Print |
|
You are here: Home > Business > Business > Should Franchisors be Required to List Litigation in Disclosure Documents? |
|
Suggest You - Should Franchisors be Required to List Litigation in Disclosure Documents?
Fuel Costs Skyrocket Does This Hurt Companies Who Pass On the Costs Also? , that is where the strength is in franchising.When fuel costs go up so do shipping rates at UPS, FedEx, Railroads, Buses and even Airlines with ticket price increases and surcharges too. For us to adequately discuss this issue we must also understand the Flow of Fuel.We must also come to terms with the priority of fuel and its costs in the flows of our civilization as it is one of the most important flows, next too common currency, communication, food distribution, water, law and education. But without fuel flows and stability, we will cause issues with all the others too that Now then if the Federal Trade Commission in their newest rule making session determines that this rule is to be enacted, my franchisees and future franchisees will know that we are push overs, that even though our franchise documents have teeth of steel, we never file any lawsuits. So if it enacted, then I will go out immediately and start some lawsuits and sue franchisees who have violate RFID Labels What Do I Need To Know For Products In Canada And The USA! Currently Franchisors are required to list litigation in the Uniform Franchise Offering Circular, which is against them. Soon they maybe required to list the litigation that they file as well. In my opinion this is a bad idea all the way around. First of all putting dirty laundry in a UFOC is bad business, the more that is there the worse it is for the brand name and the future franchisees psyche going into a new business. It creates fear, it closes communication; if the franchisor is required to list the litigation that they file then, it makes the franchisee more apt to hide problems during franchisor visits to the franchised outlets, it is not good. It is dangerous to the enforcement of the quality and consistency of the system. Some franchisors never sue their franchisees, I have always taken this tact, however such a requirement for disclosure would mean I would want to file a bundle of lawsuits to show my willingness to enforce my system.RFID labels, I hear the term but what does it mean and should I be thinking of using it for my business? RFID is a radio frequency identification . Every product is identified somehow. A sign, a label, a barcode label and an RFID label are all different ways to identify product. Which one should I chose? If I own a lemonade stand chances are I'll make a sign to describe what's in the pitcher. If I manufacture gum, chances are that my label will have words to tell the consumer what it is, and a bar code for the cash register scanner to iden Having a little bit of litigation history which is relevant to the future ability of the company to fulfill it’s duties might be worthy, probably not, but possibly. Perhaps a little history might be of value, but it is not that big of an issue really. Second off I have never filed against a franchisee in our franchise, but if the franchisees know that, well then they will take advantage of the franchise relationship, it is human nature. There are numerous times I have let a franchisee off the hook, because it seemed like the right thing to do and because I did not wish to spend my time or money in court or paying attorneys, as they have never done anything positive for franchising. I usually chock it up as experience and move on, besides the time is better spent moving forward, building creating and uniting, that is where the strength is in franchising. Now then if the Federal Trade Commission in their newest rule making session determines that this rule is to be enacted, my franchisees and future franchisees will know that we are push overs, that even though our franchise documents have teeth of steel, we never file any lawsuits. So if it enacted, then I will go out immediately and start some lawsuits and sue franchisees who have violated Exporting to Mexico closes communication; if the franchisor is required to list the litigation that they file then, it makes the franchisee more apt to hide problems during franchisor visits to the franchised outlets, it is not good. It is dangerous to the enforcement of the quality and consistency of the system. Some franchisors never sue their franchisees, I have always taken this tact, however such a requirement for disclosure would mean I would want to file a bundle of lawsuits to show my willingness to enforce my system.What most people don't know is that exporting products is actually quite simple. And while you might already know the basics of selling your product in the USA, why not expand your horizons by exporting to Mexico? When you widen your customer base, you allow your profits to be larger and longer term. Remember, Mexico is the #1 trade partner with the US and the #1 importer of US products.It's interesting to note that not many people are exporting out of the country right now. Most of the American made products are staying right h Having a little bit of litigation history which is relevant to the future ability of the company to fulfill it’s duties might be worthy, probably not, but possibly. Perhaps a little history might be of value, but it is not that big of an issue really. Second off I have never filed against a franchisee in our franchise, but if the franchisees know that, well then they will take advantage of the franchise relationship, it is human nature. There are numerous times I have let a franchisee off the hook, because it seemed like the right thing to do and because I did not wish to spend my time or money in court or paying attorneys, as they have never done anything positive for franchising. I usually chock it up as experience and move on, besides the time is better spent moving forward, building creating and uniting, that is where the strength is in franchising. Now then if the Federal Trade Commission in their newest rule making session determines that this rule is to be enacted, my franchisees and future franchisees will know that we are push overs, that even though our franchise documents have teeth of steel, we never file any lawsuits. So if it enacted, then I will go out immediately and start some lawsuits and sue franchisees who have violate How A Mail Forwarding Service Can Increase Your Customer Base a bundle of lawsuits to show my willingness to enforce my system.Are you a small or medium sized business that is struggling to survive? If so, where is your business located? Each year, millions of small to medium sized business owners experience business debt and end up seeing their dreams fail. The majority of the time, the business concept was right on, but location was the problem. Yes, the location. If you are trying to operate a business, but you are located in an area where your business cannot reach its highest potential, you may end up experiencing problems. However, you don’t have to ke Having a little bit of litigation history which is relevant to the future ability of the company to fulfill it’s duties might be worthy, probably not, but possibly. Perhaps a little history might be of value, but it is not that big of an issue really. Second off I have never filed against a franchisee in our franchise, but if the franchisees know that, well then they will take advantage of the franchise relationship, it is human nature. There are numerous times I have let a franchisee off the hook, because it seemed like the right thing to do and because I did not wish to spend my time or money in court or paying attorneys, as they have never done anything positive for franchising. I usually chock it up as experience and move on, besides the time is better spent moving forward, building creating and uniting, that is where the strength is in franchising. Now then if the Federal Trade Commission in their newest rule making session determines that this rule is to be enacted, my franchisees and future franchisees will know that we are push overs, that even though our franchise documents have teeth of steel, we never file any lawsuits. So if it enacted, then I will go out immediately and start some lawsuits and sue franchisees who have violate The Working Mother and Its Chance of Improvement l take advantage of the franchise relationship, it is human nature. There are numerous times I have let a franchisee off the hook, because it seemed like the right thing to do and because I did not wish to spend my time or money in court or paying attorneys, as they have never done anything positive for franchising. I usually chock it up as experience and move on, besides the time is better spent moving forward, building creating and uniting, that is where the strength is in franchising.The technological advancement and the continuous innovations had made everything under the sun to be excruciated by changes not everybody benefited from the realm of development as they say. Only small part of the world determines what really lays ahead, but on the deeper side of the communities whose family experiencing uncomfortable life made the mother work to augment the growing financial gap of the family.In the 3rd world countries where most of the businessmen establish their manufacturing industries had seen the capacity of Now then if the Federal Trade Commission in their newest rule making session determines that this rule is to be enacted, my franchisees and future franchisees will know that we are push overs, that even though our franchise documents have teeth of steel, we never file any lawsuits. So if it enacted, then I will go out immediately and start some lawsuits and sue franchisees who have violate The Details Dance: A Simple Three-Step for Event Planners Wanting to get Online Registration Right , that is where the strength is in franchising.A couple of weeks ago I attended an event planners Christmas function. The turnout was decent, there was no shortage of skewered prawns or celebratory cocktails and a good amount of effort had gone into the costumes worn by circulating serving staff.A few minutes into it however, I noticed one lady propped on a bar stool, looking tired and unimpressed. An ex-planner, with a career lifetime in the industry, she commented "They always get it wrong with the music at the beginning of these things". She was right. The funk band on stage Now then if the Federal Trade Commission in their newest rule making session determines that this rule is to be enacted, my franchisees and future franchisees will know that we are push overs, that even though our franchise documents have teeth of steel, we never file any lawsuits. So if it enacted, then I will go out immediately and start some lawsuits and sue franchisees who have violated our contract and gotten away with it. I will have to pick a case I can win easily and quickly for a high dollar amount. I can think of several. I have every right to do that and I will when and if this rule is changed, so then I can include some litigation filed by the franchisor in my documents. These folks I will be suing are the Federal Trade Commission consumers, which they are suppose to protect and they are toast. Is that what the FTC really wants? I guess it employs more attorneys in the world? Isn’t it better to work things out? But if the franchise documents have no litigation from me, then I guess I better get some to show strength as it is a common and well known fast it is best to negotiate from a position of strength. The FTC is getting in the way of the Frachise Relationship each and every time they add more disclosure. It hurts consumers and they either know or should have known that and therefore should be disgorged of their ill-gotten jobs. If a franchisor is thought to be weak, then the system can too easily be torn down, by bombarded with renegade franchisees and forming of Franchisee Associations (unions). Isn’t that why the Federal Trade Commission files cases against franchisors? I mean you have documented no fraud in franchising, yet the FTC is filing cases, to show strength right? Isn’t that why they grandstand in the media all these cases yet never fix the real issues? Examples: Runaway Identity Theft, SPAM, Spyware have all increased since the Federal Trade Commission got involved. The FTC should not be let off the hook for dereliction of duty, no matter how many cases they file. I think the problem is really at the Federal Trade Commission not the franchising community; we have documented this in our letters and
HTTP = HTML link (for blogs, profiles,phorums):
Related Articles:Everything You Ever Wanted To Know About Manufacturers Parking Signs and Property Signs
|