to do with duplicate content. And it's not anything like an active penalty. It's just a by-product of how the search engines work.

And now, here's my contribution to the confusion. I publish an article which I put on my PR0 site. Somebody with a PR6 site picks it up and publishes it too. Surprise, t

Building sites is an interesting thing to do. If you really enjoy having a bad time. No, actually, I love all this stuff, but I'm unable to figure out just what the search engines are doing.

However, I have decided that it really doesn't matter. Not because it doesn't matter,but because it's nearly impossible to keep on top of the changes and still do anything.

Tracking what's going on is nearly impossible. The forums are full of a lot of BS unsupported by anything except wishful thinking and plain lunacy. There's very little trustworthy research with real data.

Just for the sheer fun of it, let's look at the "Duplicate Content Penalty." This has been around for a long time. It's almost like an urban legend. There is a near total lack of anything like reasonable proof that such a thing exists in the form most people understand.

What it suggests is that if my site has the same content on a page as some other site, then one of us will be penalized somehow. Gee, did anybody notice how there are all these article directories with identical pages? Which one got penalized and how?

Oh, I believe there definitely is a duplicate content penalty all right, it just doesn't seem to me to have anything to do with duplicate content. And it's not anything like an active penalty. It's just a by-product of how the search engines work.

And now, here's my contribution to the confusion. I publish an article which I put on my PR0 site. Somebody with a PR6 site picks it up and publishes it too. Surprise, th

ossible to keep on top of the changes and still do anything.

Tracking what's going on is nearly impossible. The forums are full of a lot of BS unsupported by anything except wishful thinking and plain lunacy. There's very little trustworthy research with real data.

Just for the sheer fun of it, let's look at the "Duplicate Content Penalty." This has been around for a long time. It's almost like an urban legend. There is a near total lack of anything like reasonable proof that such a thing exists in the form most people understand.

What it suggests is that if my site has the same content on a page as some other site, then one of us will be penalized somehow. Gee, did anybody notice how there are all these article directories with identical pages? Which one got penalized and how?

Oh, I believe there definitely is a duplicate content penalty all right, it just doesn't seem to me to have anything to do with duplicate content. And it's not anything like an active penalty. It's just a by-product of how the search engines work.

And now, here's my contribution to the confusion. I publish an article which I put on my PR0 site. Somebody with a PR6 site picks it up and publishes it too. Surprise, t

t's look at the "Duplicate Content Penalty." This has been around for a long time. It's almost like an urban legend. There is a near total lack of anything like reasonable proof that such a thing exists in the form most people understand.

What it suggests is that if my site has the same content on a page as some other site, then one of us will be penalized somehow. Gee, did anybody notice how there are all these article directories with identical pages? Which one got penalized and how?

Oh, I believe there definitely is a duplicate content penalty all right, it just doesn't seem to me to have anything to do with duplicate content. And it's not anything like an active penalty. It's just a by-product of how the search engines work.

And now, here's my contribution to the confusion. I publish an article which I put on my PR0 site. Somebody with a PR6 site picks it up and publishes it too. Surprise, t

e as some other site, then one of us will be penalized somehow. Gee, did anybody notice how there are all these article directories with identical pages? Which one got penalized and how?

Oh, I believe there definitely is a duplicate content penalty all right, it just doesn't seem to me to have anything to do with duplicate content. And it's not anything like an active penalty. It's just a by-product of how the search engines work.

And now, here's my contribution to the confusion. I publish an article which I put on my PR0 site. Somebody with a PR6 site picks it up and publishes it too. Surprise, t

to do with duplicate content. And it's not anything like an active penalty. It's just a by-product of how the search engines work.

And now, here's my contribution to the confusion. I publish an article which I put on my PR0 site. Somebody with a PR6 site picks it up and publishes it too. Surprise, they get indexed and I don't. Later maybe I get indexed but it doesn't do me a lot of good PR-wise. Is this a duplicate content penalty? Yes - but mostly no. The search engines didn't say, "I'm going cream this PR0 for putting up this article that's on this PR6 over here."

All they did was see that the PR6 is a much higher authority site than my PR0. You know, the SE algorithms can figure this sort of thing out. They don't care if it's my very own article, why should they? So the PR6 site gets the indexing and what all. And I don't. Damn, I been penalized. Nope. Just treated like a PR0 site.

However, I now have a link to my site from a PR6 site (if they didn't cheat me by using a rel no follow). That's a very good thing and maybe someday I'll be an authority site too.

Has this so-called duplicate content penalty hurt me? Not if it's my own article pointing to my site. If it's a third-party article with no link to my site that's on a couple hundred other sites, then it isn't going to help me much, but it isn't going to hurt me either. It just doesn't matter - except to my visitors if they find the article useful. You remember them, the visitors? That's why we have sites.

What does this suggest